Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Headley

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 2, 1923No. 1521PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from concurrent decisions in an interference case, in which the Patent Office awarded priority of invention to Headley and Thompson, who were the first to file.

*1004The single count of the issue originated with Lynch, to whom a patent inadvertently issued, and read as follows:

“A glass-blowing machine, comprising a rotating table and a series of molds arranged thereon for simultaneous operation, said molds having open tops to receive the gather, a regulator, means controlled by the regulator for blowing air into the top of a mold, means for locking the table during…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Knutson v. GallsworthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  2. Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. General Electric Company v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  4. Stern v. SchroederCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  5. Brogden v. SlaterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API