Legal Opinion

Hilden v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 1985No. C5-83-1143PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment declaring that bodily injury residual liability coverage afforded under a single policy insuring three described automobiles may not be stacked. We affirm.

The defendant, Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company, issued a family automobile policy to Alfred and Elsie Hilden, as named insureds, affording insurance coverage on three described automobiles. The policy limits with respect to liability for bodily injury arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a covered automobile are $100,000 for each person and $300,- 000 for each…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. North River Insurance Co. v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Yeager v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Higgins v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. v. Widness Ex Rel. WidnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Latterell v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API