Legal Opinion

Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 19, 1985No. CX-83-1977PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

We must decide whether a policy exclusion which precludes underinsured motorist coverage for an insured’s injuries arising from a vehicle owned by the insured but not insured under the insurance policy is enforceable when the policy was issued and the accident occurred after the repeal of the provision of the No-Fault Act which required the insurer to offer the insured underinsured motorist coverage. The trial court granted summary judgment declaring respondent Sobania eligible for underinsured motorist benefits. The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. American Motorist Insurance Co. v. SarvelaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Yeager v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Hilden v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. UrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Higgins v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. AMCO Insurance Co. v. LangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Schwochert v. American Family Mutual Ins.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Klang v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API