Legal Opinion
In re Haas
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 1, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 9136PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the dismissal by the Board of Appeals in Ex parte Haas, 175 USPQ 217 (1972), for lack of jurisdiction of an appeal from the examiner’s “withdrawal from further consideration” of claims 1 and 2 of appellant’s application, serial No. 821,511, filed May 2,1969, entitled “Novel Polymerization .Initiators.” 1 We hold that the board erred in its denial of jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 7 and 134 and remand for review on the merits of the examiner’s action.
The Invention
The invention relates to benzoyl peroxide compounds containing reactive moieties on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Application of Leo L. HengeholdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of John Edward JamesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of John L. Szajna and Ronald G. LumpCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- In re DollingerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In re LitmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
3Cited by14 opinions
- Digital Equipment Corporation v. Sidney A. Diamond, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Margolis v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- In re MottCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- In re VossCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In re WeberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.