Legal Opinion

Prezel Et Ux. v. Spencer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1930No. Appeal 138 and 139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, recovered separate verdicts against defendant in the respective sums of $1800 and $1500 for the personal injuries suffered by each, and damages to the husband’s car, in an automobile accident; defendant’s motions for a new trial and judgments n.o.v. were overruled and he now appeals from the judgments entered upon the verdicts. As the question involved at No. 139' is identical with that at No. 138 but one opinion will be filed.

Appellant, A. D. Spencer, is a dealer in Buick, Cadillac and LaSalle automobiles at Charleroi, Pa., under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haring v. ConnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Orluske v. Nash Pittsburgh Motors Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Reed v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Herrington v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Theil v. WolfeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conley v. MervisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Morgan v. Heinel Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. DaCosta v. Valley Forge Military Academy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API