Legal Opinion

Orluske v. Nash Pittsburgh Motors Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1926No. Appeal, 38PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

Plaintiff sued to recover damages for personal injuries, resulting from being struck by an automobile owned by defendant company, and operated by Charles Vetter, its employe as a used-car salesman, about eleven o’clock on the evening of September 26, 1923, while driving on a public highway near the village of Glenshaw, Allegheny County. The jury having found for plaintiff, judgment was subsequently entered for defendant non obstante veredicto for the reason the evidence failed to show Vetter was engaged in the business of his employer at the time of the accident.

Th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scheel v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. McGrath v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Luckett v. ReighardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Oil City Fuel Supply Co. v. BoundySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  5. Brown v. Kittanning Clay Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Conley v. MervisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Bergen v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Martin v. LipschitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Morgan v. Heinel Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Rucinski v. CohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API