Morgan v. Heinel Motors, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
Plaintiffs, suing on behalf of themselves and their minor child to recover for injuries sustained by the child, obtained verdicts of $3,000 for the parents and $7,000 for the child. Motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial were refused. In refusing the new trial motion, the learned court stated that the verdicts were excessive and gave plaintiffs the alternative of remitting all of the verdict over the sum of $131.43 in the case of the parents, and in the case of the child, the excess over $6,000, or of retrying the case. The plaintiffs elected to file the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conley v. MervisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Rau v. Wilkes-Barre & Eastern R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Warman v. CraigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Orluske v. Nash Pittsburgh Motors Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Reed v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kimble v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Kissell v. Motor Age Transit Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Balanti v. Stineman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- McDermott v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Norton v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.