Reed v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
Defendants appeal from a judgment on a verdict recovered against them by plaintiff for damages sustained by him in a collision between an automobile in which he was riding and one belonging to them. In the disposition we shall make of the case, the circumstances of the accident become unimportant.
Defendants were dealers in automobiles and as such possessed dealer’s license plates. They owned the second-hand automobile which collided with plaintiff’s car. One Lyda was in their employ and had taken the car, which was out of condition, to his home for the purpose…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Farbo v. CaskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Markle v. PerotSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Treon v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller v. Service and Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Norton v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Loper Et Ux. v. P. G. Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Morgan v. Heinel Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Lanteigne v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.