Betty v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
In this proceeding an alternative writ of mandate was granted upon a showing that the superior court had refused to direct its clerk to issue an execution upon a judgment. The question for decision concerns the time within which a judgment, which has been revived under the provisions of section 708 of the Code of Civil Procedure, “has the same force and effect” as the original one.
The judgment in controversy was rendered September 20, 1932, in an action brought by Lorn H. Betty. It provided that the plaintiff should have a lien upon certain property and directed that execution issue…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Merguire v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Cross v. ZaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Heine Piano Co. v. BloomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Silver Burdett Co. v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Hitchcock v. CaruthersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Rose v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Sipper v. UrbanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.