Legal Opinion

Bagwell v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1914PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover damages for personal injury, caused, as the plaintiff alleges, by the negligence of the defendant.(612) The injury occurred at a public railroad crossing by a collision between the train of the defendant and an automobile which was owned and driven by Mr. Jamison and in which the plaintiff was a guest.

The plaintiff offered evidence tending to prove that the defendant failed to give notice of the approach of the train to the crossing, and also, if it did give notice, that by the exercise of ordinary care the train could have been stopped in time to avert the injury.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Edwards v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Crampton v. Ivie Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Pusey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Little v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Earwood v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Campbell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Pusey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API