Sullivan v. Sullivan
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facta are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant in an action of trover for the conversion of two barrels of whisky, which plaintiff claimed to own. The facts, aside from some questions as to the admission of testimony, were these: Plaintiff
is a liquor dealer, in the wholesale business, at Cincinnati, having a distillery at Frankfort, Ky. Early in February, 1887, plaintiff, being in Detroit, took a verbal order from Ryan & McOarney, of Detroit, for two barrels of whisky, and sent it to the distillery at Frankfort, where the order was filled, and the whisky shipped to Detroit by the only railroad out of Frankfort, on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kling v. FriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- William B. Schultz, and Cross-Appellant v. Tecumseh Products, a Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Congdon v. KendallNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Leggett & Meyer Tobacco Co. v. CollierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Brent v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
- Ericsson Manufacturing Co. v. Caille Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.