Congdon v. Kendall
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from tlie district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Strode, J. References: Merriam v. HartfordcC-N. H. B. Go., 20 Conn. 354; Packard v. Getman, 6 Cow. [N. Y.] 757; Buckman v. Levi, 3 Camp. [Eng.] 414; Frith v. Barker, 2 Johns. [N. Y.] 327; Foster v. Dohle, 17 Neb. 631; Marriner v. Paxton-, 17 Neb. 634; Irish v: Pheby, 28 Neb. 231; Weir v. Barnes, 38 Neb. 875; Pond Machine Tool Go. v. Robinson, 37 N. W. Rej): [Minn.] 99; McIntyre- v. Tranitner, 63 Cal.…
Read the full summary
Appeal from tlie district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Strode, J. References: Merriam v. HartfordcC-N. H. B. Go., 20 Conn. 354; Packard v. Getman, 6 Cow. [N. Y.] 757; Buckman v. Levi, 3 Camp. [Eng.] 414; Frith v. Barker, 2 Johns. [N. Y.] 327; Foster v. Dohle, 17 Neb. 631; Marriner v. Paxton-, 17 Neb. 634; Irish v: Pheby, 28 Neb. 231; Weir v. Barnes, 38 Neb. 875; Pond Machine Tool Go. v. Robinson, 37 N. W. Rej): [Minn.] 99; McIntyre- v. Tranitner, 63 Cal. 429; Hubbard v. Brown, 90 Mass. 590; Watts-Gampbell Go. v. Yeungliny, 125 N. Y. 1; Badger Lumber Go. v. Mayes, 38 Neb. 830.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
Kendall & Smith being the owners of a flouring mill at Woodlawn, this state, on May 10, 1893, executed a mortgage thereon to C. B. Congdon & Co. to secure a sum of money certain. Prior to the making of the mortgage Edward P. Allis & Co. furnished Kendall & Smith machinery for the reparation and reconstruction of said mill, and subsequently a claim for a mechanic’s lien was filed in the office of the register of deeds of Lancaster county. The decree was entered in the court below foreclosing the mortgage. The court refused Allis & Co. a mechanic’s lien upon the ground that the claim for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fagan & Osgood v. Boyle Ice Machine Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
- Mallory v. La Crosse Abattoir Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- Great Western Manufacturing Co. v. Hunter Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1883
- Sarbecker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Metcalf & WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Vogt v. SchienebeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- A. J. Neimeyer Lumber Co. v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Garfield & Proctor Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Haskell v. McClintic-Marshall Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Taylor Bros. v. GillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.