Legal Opinion

Ericsson Manufacturing Co. v. Caille Bros.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1917No. Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne; Kendrick, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Ericsson Manufacturing Company against Caille Brothers Company for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff is a manufacturing corporation of Buffalo, N. Y., especially engaged in making and selling telephones and magnetos. Defendant is a Michigan corporation located in Detroit, and at the time events involved -in this controversy arose was engaged, among other things, in making and about to put on the market a small outboard or portable motor appliance for rowboats and launches. This action was brought to recover for 50 small magnetos to be used in that connection, claimed to have been manufactured by plaintiff in 1913, and shipped to defendant under a special order for the same, at an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kling v. FriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Sullivan v. SullivanMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bauscher v. GiesMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erving Paper Mills, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Hudson-Sharp MacHine Co., a Wisconsin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  2. Shirek v. RoesinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API