Legal Opinion
William B. Schultz, and Cross-Appellant v. Tecumseh Products, a Corporation, and Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 27, 1962No. 14650_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*428O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellee, a citizen of Kentucky, brought suit to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him when a refrigerator compressor unit which he had installed in a food market exploded. The accident happened in Kentucky. Defendant-appellant, a Michigan corporation, manufactured the unit which caused the injuries. The suit was tried to a jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, and resulted in a verdict of $74,349.64 for the plaintiff. Of that amount, $21,994.00 was ordered remitted by the District…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Albert J. Doherty v. American Motors Corporation, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Dealers Transport Co. v. Battery Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Columbia Brick Works, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.