Hudick v. Tycz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtWynne, J.
This appeal is concerned with the facts of a highway fatality. The assignment of errors has to do only with the finding and conclusions of the trier.
The trial court’s finding of facts, so far as it is not challenged, is, in summary, as follows: On December 15,1953, at about 6:10 a.m., the plaintiff’s decedent was struck by an automobile driven by the defendant Prank Tycz and was killed. The vehicle was owned by the defendant Mary Tycz and at the time of the occurrence was being operated as a family car. The plaintiff’s decedent was on her way to work. It was dark at the time. She was crossing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Antenucci v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Skovronski v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Drobish v. PetronziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Fandiller v. PelusoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Priday v. BaconSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- State v. CoulombeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Katz v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Greenberg v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Lucas v. Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.