Legal Opinion

Fandiller v. Peluso

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 4, 1952PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment awarding damages to the plaintiff for the defendant’s negligence in the operation of her automobile.

From the finding and exhibits it appears that, in Waterbury, South Main Street, on the east, and Bank Street, on the west, run approximately north and south and converge at Apothecaries Hall, a Waterbury landmark, north of which they merge to form Exchange Place, which extends northerly as a wide street or plaza. Harrison Avenue runs substantially east and west and intersects Exchange Place from the west. The area is well illuminated by street lights.

Th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shaughnessy v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Skovronski v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  3. Degnan v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  4. Peterson v. MeehanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Caschetto v. Silliman Godfrey Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pillou v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  2. Slack v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Drobish v. PetronziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. McDonald v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  5. Hudick v. TyczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API