Legal Opinion

Newell v. Musgrove

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 14, 1928No. 17715PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, C.

On September 9, 1925, T. L. Musgrove, plaintiff, sued R. S. Colton and Rose Newell, defendants, for damages. He alleged, in substance, that on August 7, 1925, through the negligent operation of their automobiles in approaching an intersection of two certain public highways, the defendant Newell's car collided with the defendant Col-ton’s ear in the intersection with such force that the impact caused the defendant Col-ton’s car to strike him with such violence as to inflict serious and permanent injuries upon his body; that such injuries consisted of “an extensive open comminuted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Harris v. Misssouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Big Jack Mining Co. v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Alva Roller Mills v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Wooten v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Riser v. HerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. v. ArmourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Gourley v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API