Legal Opinion

Krapfl v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 22, 1996No. 95-174PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

This appeal presents a dispute concerning whether a subrogated medical payment insurer, who intervened in plaintiffs’ personal injury action, may be held responsible for a pro rata share of plaintiffs’ attorney fees and litigation expenses in recovering damages from defendants. The district court interpreted our decision in Principal Casualty Insurance Co. v. Norwood, 463 N.W.2d 66 (Iowa 1990), as relieving the subrogated insurer from that responsibility. We disagree and reverse the judgment of the district court.

Plaintiffs, Nancy and Thomas Krapfl, are insured under a family…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peters v. LyonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Price v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Washington Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. HammettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Cawley v. Peoples Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark v. BremnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. v. HeikenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Bride v. HeckartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Estate of Boyd v. NormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  4. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. Ahlers v. EMCASCO Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API