Legal Opinion

Ahlers v. EMCASCO Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 22, 1996No. 95-504PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

This dispute concerns whether a workers’ compensation insurance carrier that is entitled to be indemnified from a third-party recovery by an injured employee must pay a one-third contingent fee claim of the employee’s attorney for the latter’s efforts in obtaining a settlement for a sum less than the workers’ compensation lien. The plaintiff, Thereasa Ahlers, received approximately $35,000 in workers’ compensation benefits after being injured while driving a school bus in the course of her employment. She subsequently brought a suit against the driver of the vehicle that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Krapfl v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Kirkpatrick v. PattersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Farris v. General Growth Development Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hobson v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Bride v. HeckartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Ewing v. Allied Construction ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Aspelmeier, Fisch, Power, Warner & Engberg v. Allied Group Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API