Washington Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Hammett
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
The appellee brought this suit for a declaratory judgment. She seeks to determine whether her attorney, W. B. Howard, is entitled to charge the appellant, her automobile collision insurer, an attorney’s fee for having recovered the full amount of a subrogation claim held by the insurance company. This appeal is from a decree permitting Howard to retain 40% of the recovery as his fee.
In May of 1962 the appellant issued a $50 deductible policy of collision insurance to the appellee. On October 1 the appellee suffered personal injuries and property damage in a collision with Ray Purcell’s car.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Services Automobile Association v. HillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Powers v. CALVERT FIRE INS. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Shawnee Fire Insurance v. CosgroveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- McGeorge Contracting Co. v. MizellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Pontiac Mutual County Fire & Lightning Insurance v. SheibleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Baier v. State Farm Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Page v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Barreca v. CobbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Baier v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Amica Mutual Insurance v. MaloneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.