Legal Opinion

Price v. King

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 11, 1963No. 50980PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnell, J.

This is an interlocutory appeal perfected with permission.

The question before us involves the right of a Workmen’s Compensation insurance carrier to intervene in a common-law action.

For the purposes of this appeal the facts are not in dispute.

Walter Price, plaintiff herein, and Charles King, defendant herein, were involved in a motor-vehicle intersection collision. Plaintiff was injured. Plaintiff was at the time an employee (not defendant’s employee) covered by Workmen’s Compensation. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company was the Workmen’s Compensation carrier for plaintiff’s employer.

Plainti…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stewart v. HiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. Cawley v. Peoples Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Southern Surety Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Berridge v. PraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Waits v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. Evans v. Howard R. Green Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. Turner v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  4. Carter v. Wiese Corp.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1984
  5. Schimerowski v. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API