Legal Opinion

Ervin v. Cannon Mills Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1951No. 383PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

64 S.E.2d 431 (1951)

233 N.C. 415

ERVIN

v.

CANNON MILLS CO. et al.

No. 383.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 11, 1951.

Guy T. Carswell, and Shannonhouse, Bell & Horn, Charlotte, Burke & Burke, Taylorsville, for plaintiff, appellee.

Hartsell & Hartsell, Concord, Scott & Collier, Statesville, for defendants, appellants.

DEVIN, Justice.

The only assignment of error brought forward in defendants' appeal is the denial of their motion for judgment of nonsuit.

The determination of this question requires consideration of the evidence offered in accord with the rule that it be viewed in the light most…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tart v. RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Mattingly v. NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Rice v. City of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Donlop v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Reed v. ShellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API