Legal Opinion
Ambraziunas v. Bank of Boulder
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 25, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-K-1567PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, Senior District Judge.
In this case, over one hundred Plaintiffs seek relief against Defendants Bank of Boulder (“the Bank”) and Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. (“D & B”) arising out of their alleged participation in the M & L Business Machine Co., Inc. fraudulent Ponzi scheme. Before me are: (1) the Bank’s renewed motion to dismiss, (2) D & B’s motion to dismiss all claims except the negligence claim of Vern Leather-man, 1 (3) D & B’s motion to strike the designation of certain additional Plaintiffs and the withdrawal of certain other Plaintiffs, (4) potential…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Williams v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brooks v. Bank of BoulderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Fernandez v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- In Re Stat-Tech Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Armani v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- Johnson v. N.T.I.District Court, D. Colorado · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.