Legal Opinion
Fernandez v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided July 17, 2000No. 1:99-cv-02218PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
BOLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before me on the plaintiffs Motion to Amend Complaint (the “Motion to Amend”), filed June 15, 2000. The defendants have filed an opposition. The Motion to Amend is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
The Scheduling Order, as amended, established June 15, 2000, as the deadline by which the parties were required to file any motions for joinder of parties or amendment of pleadings. The Motion to Amend was filed prior to the expiration of that deadline. Consequently, the plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend is governed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bauchman v. West High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Colorado Visionary Academy v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Brooks v. Bank of BoulderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Ambraziunas v. Bank of BoulderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994
- Carmody v. SCI Colorado Funeral Services, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- ANDREW PEEPLES, and MICHELLE PEEPLES, by and through her Power of Attorney, GREGORY HOUSTON v. DOORDASH, INC., and AARON MILLARDDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- Carrazco v. MorrisonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Cooper v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Cousik v. PhelanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc. v. City and County of Broomfield, TheDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.