Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Ray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1923No. 12234PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in error for the recovery of certain real estate situated in Atoka county, Okla., and for judgment quieting the title of plaintiff in error. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff was enrolled as a Choctaw freedman and the lands in controversy were allotted to her as her allotment. On March 1, 1905, plaintiff, joined by her husband, executed a mortgage on her allotment to the American Investment Company to secure a promissory note. On…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Tidal Oil Company v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Sandlin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Winters v. Oklahoma Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. FarrissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Lynch v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Amoskeag Savings Bank v. EpplerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Circle v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1979
  5. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. HendricksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API