Legal Opinion
Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Farriss
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 2, 1926No. 13749PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Only one proposition is presented and argued seriously by plaintiffs in their brief, and that is the proposition stated in the tenth assignment of error as follows:
"That said court erred in not holding as a matter of law by rendition of proper judgment that as to the defendants in error, Alpha Cash, Patterson Shi Cash, Thomas L. Farris, and A. H. Shi, the judgment rendered in the district court of Garvin county, Okla. on the 8th day of June, 1921, in said cause No. 1532, entitled Alvin F. Pyeatt, Guardian, et al. v. Southwestern Surety Co., a Corporation, et al., refusing to vacate and modify…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Tidal Oil Company v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- McDuffie v. Geiser Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Priddy v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- F. B. Collins Inv. Co. of Clinton v. BeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bruce v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- National Bank of Commerce of Tulsa v. ABC Construction Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Read v. ReadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Fourth National Bank of Tulsa v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Mothersead v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.