Legal Opinion

In Re Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2006No. 06-BG-550PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility adopted the Hearing Committee’s recommendation that Timothy Brown, a member of our Bar, be disbarred but that, because his alcohol addiction was the substantial cause of the misconduct and because he is now substantially rehabilitated, his disbarment should be stayed. The Board also recommended that respondent be placed on probation for three years, conditioned on his full satisfaction of the restitution and sobriety monitoring conditions previously imposed upon him by this court, repayment to the Client Security Fund, and payment of interest to former…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. In Re DietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. In Re MarshallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re StuartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. In Re StuartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API