Legal Opinion
Lowman v. Housing Authority
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 11, 1963PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the death of his decedent, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. After a trial to the court, judgment was rendered for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed.
The finding of the trial court, which is not subject to correction, recites the following facts: The defendant housing authority owns a moderate-rental apartment building in which the family of the decedent, a boy nineteen months old, lived, since 1952, under a written lease which contained a clause permitting the defendant to enter the premises at all…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ruerat v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Briganti v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Ryan v. George L. Lilley Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Stebel v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Fogarty v. M. J. Beuchler & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Malvicini v. Stratfield Motor Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Witort v. United States Rubber Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1966
- Conlon v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Barretta v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.