Legal Opinion
Conlon v. G. Fox & Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacDonald, J.
In this appeal from a judgment awarding damages to the plaintiffs Delia Conlon and her husband for injuries claimed to have resulted from the negligent application of a permanent wave to Mrs. Conlon’s hair, the principal issues raised for our consideration relate to (1) the applicability of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and (2) the sufficiency of the evidence of causation to support the verdict.
The first issue is raised by the defendants’ attack on the court’s inclusion in its charge of references to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur which the defendants claim was inapplicable by reason…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jump v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Intelisano v. GreenwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Stebel v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- DePaola v. SeamourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Lowman v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Malvicini v. Stratfield Motor Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Fox v. FoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Mahon v. HeimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Kos v. Lawrence + Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- Mahon v. HeimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.