Legal Opinion
Fogarty v. M. J. Beuchler & Son, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 5, 1938PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action as administratrix on the estate of her little son. He died as a result of being burned by hot water which escaped by reason of the breaking of a pipe leading to the bathtub in an apartment occupied by the family, in a tenement house owned by the defendant. There is little conflict in the testimony material to the issues presented upon the appeal. The father of the little boy was janitor of the tenement house. On Saturday night he moved from an apartment he had occupied to that where the accident occurred. The next morning the plaintiff found that the water…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Altz v. . LeibersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Tallman v. . MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Motiejaitis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Jump v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Ryan v. George L. Lilley Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Smith v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Pollack v. GampelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Shegda v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Chipman v. National Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.