Legal Opinion
Corrugated Paper Products, Inc. v. Longview Fibre Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 31, 1989No. 88-1668PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Corrugated Paper Products, Inc. (“Corrugated”), appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee, Longview Fibre Company (“Longview”). Corrugated’s complaint in this diversity case alleges that it is a third-party beneficiary of a contract for the sale of certain used industrial equipment entered into by Longview and Atlas Corrugated Machinery, Inc. (“Atlas”). Since we agree with the district court that Corrugated has not put forward any facts which would entitle it to third-party beneficiary status, we affirm.
I
Corrugated and…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Hines v. GarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Anne Dey v. Colt Construction & Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Joseph L. RAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CF INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, and Robert C. Liuzzi, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Wamiq SATTAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- David A. Kostelec v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.