Legal Opinion

Hines v. Garrett

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 25, 2004No. 2004-C-0806PublishedCited by 612 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

876 So.2d 764 (2004)

Bernice Wadsworth HINES and Wendi Wadsworth

v.

Charles GARRETT, OneBeacon Ins. Co, and American Central Insurance Co.

No. 2004-C-0806.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 25, 2004.

2Per curiam

We review a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing the record and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from it in the light most favorable to the non-movant. Summary judgment is warranted only if "there is no genuine issue as to material fact and [ ] the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." La.Code Civ. Proc. art. 966(C)(1). In ruling on a motion for summary…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  4. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Babin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by612 opinions

  1. Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  3. Danielle Larson v. Xyz Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
  4. King v. Illinois National InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  5. Luther v. Iom Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2013

607 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API