Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 25, 1949No. 34,830PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff, the owner of land bordering on Yadnais Lake in Ramsey county, sues the city of St. Paul and its board of water commissioners for wilful and intentional trespass upon his land by raising the water in the lake above the ordinary high level thereof by artificial means and controls. Attached to and made a part of the complaint is a copy of a letter written by plaintiff to the commissioner of public utilities of the city, who is ex officio chairman of the board, notifying him of the trespass. It was conceded upon the argument that the letter was insufficient under § 35…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Eastlick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Park v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. City of Duluth v. CervenySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Nicol v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Rimarcik v. JohansenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
  3. Schultz v. RuizSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Wessling v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. In Re the Trusts: Created by HormelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API