Legal Opinion

Wessling v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 31, 1988No. C3-87-2350PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

BBCA, 1 Inc. (BBCA), a Minnesota corporation, appeals a state court dismissal of its counterclaim against Douglas and Debra Wessling (Wesslings) for claimed deficiencies on a contract for deed where the Wess-lings were vendees. Appellant counterclaimed when the Wesslings sued it in state court as part of an action to quiet title. Upon the Wesslings’ motion, the state court, noting that BBCA’s earlier federal court action involving the same land had been dismissed for lack of prosecution, dismissed BBCA’s state court counterclaim as res judicata.

FACTS

This dispute arose…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Hoag v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McMenomy v. RydenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Mattsen v. PackmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Kimmel v. Texas Commerce BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paulos v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Art Goebel, Inc. v. Array Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Citimortgage, Inc. v. Norbert A. Kraus, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API