Legal Opinion

In Re the Will of Etheridge

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1950No. 24PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Of the numerous exceptions appearing in the record on this appeal, and purporting to have been taken by caveator, the ap pellant, during tbe progress of tbe trial in Superior Court, and assigned as error, tbe seventeenth exception is well taken. It bas setting similar to an exception considered and passed upon in Wells v. Odum, 205 N.C. 110, 170 S.E. 145. What is said there applies here.

In tbe Wells case, as tbe record on appeal there shows, tbe propounders offered in evidence “proof of tbe witnesses of tbe will and tbe probate of tbe Clerk” to which caveators objected. Tbe objection was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Will of ChismanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Mills v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. In Re Will of RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Wells v. . OdumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Benjamin v. TeelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1850

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. In Re the Will of KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. In re the Will of WestonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API