Legal Opinion

In Re the Will of Knight

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1959No. 668PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooke, J.

In the record on this appeal caveators make eleven assignments of error based on eighteen exceptions. However, they did not bring forward in their brief the fourth assignment of error. Therefore this assignment and the exceptions upon which it is based are deemed 'abandoned. Rule. 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 562; Darroch v. Johnson and Colville v. Johnson, 250 N.C. 307, 311, 108 S.E. 2d 589.

The first assignment of error is based on the exclusion of certain evidence which caveators sought to elicit on cross-examination from the clerk of the Superior Court of Rockingham…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Childress v. NordmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Price v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. In Re Will of StocksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Sloan v. CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CornellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Olan Mills, Inc. v. Cannon Aircraft Executive Terminal, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Teague v. Duke Power CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Wilson v. Lowe's Asheboro Hardware, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Evans v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API