Legal Opinion

Wells v. . Odum

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 12, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.

Is tbe probate of a will in common form competent as evidence of its validity on an issue of devisavit vel non, raised by a caveat filed to said will? The answer is, No. Dickens v. Bonnewell, 168 S. E. (Va.), 610.

Tbe paper-writing in question was offered for probate in common form without citation to those in interest “to see proceedings.” Benjamin v. Teel, 33 N. C., 49; Redmond v. Collins, 15 N. C., 430. This is permissible under our practice, C. S., 4139, et seq., and when thus probated in common form, even though the proceeding be ex parte? such record and probate is made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Will of ChismanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Mills v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. In Re Will of RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Redmond v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
  5. Benjamin v. TeelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1850

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. In Re Will of CharlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. In Re Will of PuettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. In Re the Will of CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. In Re Will of WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API