Mills v. . Mills
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Beo&deN, J.
Are the heirs at law of a testatrix, uncited in accordance with C. S., 4159, and not otherwise cognizant of a caveat in which the will is upheld by the verdict of a jury, estopped to file a second caveat to the will within the statutory period, as against an innocent purchaser for value?
It appears from the judgment and the agreed statement of facts that the will of testatrix was probated in common form in January, 1924. The distinction between probate in common and solemn form is clearly expressed by Ruffin, C. J., in Redmond v. Collins, 15 N. C., 430: “To enable the propounder to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Will of ChismanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Redmond v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
- In Re Will of LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Etheridge v. Corprew's Ex'rsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1855
- In Re Will of BeauchampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- In Re Will of PuettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Bailey v. . McLainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- In Re Will of RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.