Legal Opinion

Engstrom v. Atkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1929No. Docket No. 7157PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiff moves to dismiss defendant’s appeal upon the ground that “although said appeal was taken on the thirtieth day of April, 1929, no steps have been taken to perfect said appeal by causing a transcript or bill of exceptions to be settled and allowed.”

The action was tried in extra session of the Superior Court, in and for the City and County of San Francisco, before a judge from another county sitting with a jury. The trial consumed two days, and on the second day the court reporter regularly assigned to said court was absent and his place was filled by a substitute employed only…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crocker v. CrockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Town of Mill Valley v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kinkle v. Fruit Growers Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Laykin v. KarshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Brashears v. GianniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Struck v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API