Laykin v. Karsh
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this action, upon the ground that the transcript was not filed within the time required.
From the certificate of the clerk of the superior court it appears that judgment in favor of the plaintiff was entered on December 4, 1930, from which judgment the defendant appealed on the eighth day of said month and filed a notice requesting preparation of the transcript in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. Subsequently and on motion of the plaintiff the conclusions of law were modified and a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crocker v. CrockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Town of Mill Valley v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Modoc Co-Operative Assn. v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Wrynn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Engstrom v. AtkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hohnemann v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- In Re Marriage of WickanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986