Town of Mill Valley v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a rehearing of an order denying a motion to dismiss an appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The respondent has applied for a rehearing of the order denying its motion to dismiss the appeal in this ease. The rehéaring is asked on the ground that the default of the appellant occurred on October 2, 1921, which was the expiration of twenty days after he had filed his notice under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, requesting a transcript of the record and proceedings in the cause for use on appeal; that the transcript was not filed in pursuance of said notice until April 27, 1922; that no extensions of time had been granted by the court, and that after. April 2,…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Crocker v. CrockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Colburn Biological Institute v. DeBoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Hohnemann v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Rubin v. Platt Music Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Hertter v. AddisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.