Legal Opinion

Brashears v. Giannini

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1932No. Docket No. 683Published

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal taken in this action upon the ground of lack of diligence in preparing and filing a transcript of the proceedings in the trial court.

It may first be observed that the moving party has failed to make any showing, by certificate or by affidavit, that no proceeding for the preparation of a transcript is still pending in the trial court. (Rule VI of Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.)

In opposition to this motion, a showing has been made that the appellant filed on March 30, 1932, a notice to prepare the transcript on appeal in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crocker v. CrockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Town of Mill Valley v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Engstrom v. AtkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API