Legal Opinion

Kinkle v. Fruit Growers Supply Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1942No. Civ. No. 6872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal upon the ground that appellant has failed to perfect its appeal, that no transcript on appeal has been filed as required by law, and that appellant has not prosecuted its appeal with any diligence whatsoever.

The admitted facts are that notice of appeal was filed on December 12, 1941; notice to prepare transcript was served and filed on December 12, 1941; order requiring reporter to transcribe report of trial was signed, served and filed on December 22, 1941; that satisfactory financial arrangements were made with the reporter by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. JaccardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Fisher v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Des Granges v. Des GrangesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Galbraith v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Engstrom v. AtkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Williams v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Peebler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API