Legal Opinion

Carabelli v. Mountain States Life Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1935No. Civ. 9738PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff brought this action upon an insurance policy seeking to recover the sum of $1650 claimed to be due for “confining illness” benefits for 22 months at the rate of $75 per month. Upon a trial by jury, plaintiff had judgment as prayed, from which judgment defendants appeal.

The pertinent provisions of the insurance policy were as follows:

‘ ‘ Confining Illness. The Company will pay at the rate of $75.00 per month "for disability resulting from disease, the cause of which originates more than fifteen days after the date of this policy, and which confines the Insured continuously within…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rocci v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Reeves v. Midland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Ogburn v. Travelers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. First National Bank v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Sheets v. Farmers & Merchants Mutual Life & Casualty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Home Indemnity Co. of New York v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. KowalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. MilderNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API