Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ball
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1981No. Civ. 62169PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
On January 12, 1978, a pedestrian, Jacob Zodieru, was struck by a vehicle driven by appellant Amanda Ball. Ruth Zodieru, Jacob’s wife, was not present at the scene of the accident nor did she suffer any physical injuries as a direct result of it.
At the time of the incident, Amanda was insured by virtue of a policy of insurance issued by respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The policy limits applicable to bodily injury coverage were specified in the agreement to be $50,000 each person, $100,000 each occurrence.
Jacob and Ruth Zodieru thereafter filed suit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- United Services Automobile Assn. v. WarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Perkins v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Valdez v. Interinsurance Exch. of Auto. Club of S. Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Izzo v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Abellon v. Hartford InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Lepic Ex Rel. Lepic v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.