Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Kowalski
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
Appellant sought a declaratory judgment that because respondent Kowalski did not comply with the terms of the automobile liability insurance policy issued to him by appellant, or with the provisions of Insurance Code section 11580.2, subdivision (c) (3), he had no right to assert a claim against appellant under the uninsured motorist coverage of the policy. The trial court denied the relief requested.
The facts are not in dispute. Appellant issued a policy of automobile liability insurance to respondent. The policy included uninsured motorist coverage as required by Insurance Code section…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
- Anderson v. I. M. Jameson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Rampy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1973
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Kisling v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.