Legal Opinion

Beckman v. Brickley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1927No. 20379. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In this action, the appellant, Beck-man, sought to recover against the respondents, Brick-ley and Carl, for a breach of contract. A general demurrer was interposed and sustained to his complaint, following which, on Ms election to stand thereon, a judgment of dismissal was entered.

The contract, upon wMch action is founded, reads as follows:

“TMs agreement made and entered into tMs, the 26th day of October, 1924, by and between: Sarah O. BricHey, of the County of Spokane, Washington, Party of the First Part, and Victor Beckman and Alfred Johnson, to be known as the firm of Beckman & Johnson, of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. France v. Deep River Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Engleson v. Port Crescent Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Crouch v. ForbesWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Campbell v. Weston Basket & Barrel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. ANDERSON ET UX. v. MoothartOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bishop v. Du BoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Dowgialla v. KnevageWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Foelkner v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Rankin v. RidgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API