Legal Opinion
Beckman v. Brickley
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 1927No. 20379. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
In this action, the appellant, Beck-man, sought to recover against the respondents, Brick-ley and Carl, for a breach of contract. A general demurrer was interposed and sustained to his complaint, following which, on Ms election to stand thereon, a judgment of dismissal was entered.
The contract, upon wMch action is founded, reads as follows:
“TMs agreement made and entered into tMs, the 26th day of October, 1924, by and between: Sarah O. BricHey, of the County of Spokane, Washington, Party of the First Part, and Victor Beckman and Alfred Johnson, to be known as the firm of Beckman & Johnson, of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- France v. Deep River Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Engleson v. Port Crescent Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Crouch v. ForbesWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Campbell v. Weston Basket & Barrel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by10 opinions
- ANDERSON ET UX. v. MoothartOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Bishop v. Du BoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Dowgialla v. KnevageWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Foelkner v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Rankin v. RidgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.