Legal Opinion

Foelkner v. Perkins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1938No. 26955. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This cause was initiated October 30, 1936, by appellants, the vendors, to cancel a contract of sale pertaining to certain real property, and to divest respondent of any interest therein. Judgment was entered dismissing the action with prejudice, and this appeal followed.

The essential undisputed facts are these: August 23, 1923, appellants and respondent entered into a contract of sale whereby appellants sold to respondent the following described real estate to-wit: “Lot Seven (7), Block One (1), Weatherwax and Benns Addition to Aberdeen, Grays Harbor County, Washington,” otherwise known as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Gerard-Fillio Co. v. McNairWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Mowbray Pearson Co. v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Clements v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Merchants Bank of Canada v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Duprey v. DonahoeWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Byrne v. AckerlundWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Sunset Oil Co. v. VertnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Turner v. GundersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API