Legal Opinion
Crouch v. Forbes
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1911No. 8953PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Mitchell, J., entered March 24, 1910, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action for a broker’s commission.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Appellants sought in this action to recover $3,000, as commission upon a sale of real estate in which *565they claim to have acted as brokers, and appeal from an adverse judgment.
The record shows that, on September 3, 1909, they went to the home of respondent, and after some preliminary conversation, drew up the following:
“Olympia, September 3, 1909.
“This is to certify that I, Cornelia A. Forbes of Mason county, Wash., the owner of the following described property, to wit: (describing the property) and that for the consideration of $1, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I give J. G. Crouch,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zimmerman v. ZehendnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Keith v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Forland v. BoyumWashington Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Coleman v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Engleson v. Port Crescent Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Beckman v. BrickleyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.