Legal Opinion
Haralson v. Mendel
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 14, 1926No. 17469PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
H. Mendel, doing business as H. Mendel & Company, filed a suit on an open account against W. C. Lanier, doing business under the name of Lee Stein, agent. While this suit was pending, Mendel & Company garnished T. P. Haralson, who answered that he was not indebted to the defendant Lanier. This answer was traversed by the plaintiff, and the court directed a verdict in favor of the traverse. The garnishee filed' a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and he excepted.
The record discloses that Lanier was indebted to Mendel & Company for merchandise in the sum of $2,456.10; that on April…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jaques & Tinsley Co. v. Carstarphen Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Morgan v. Weil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- National Cash Register Co. v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Express Co., S. A. I. v. Bomar Shoe Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Albertson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Mitchell v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Henry King & Co. v. Arnett Bros.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928